Categories
News

Travis King: The US Soldier Who Defected to North Korea and His Sentencing for Desertion

Source link : https://usa-news.biz/2024/09/21/news/travis-king-the-us-soldier-who-defected-to-north-korea-and-his-sentencing-for-desertion/

The⁤ US soldier who crossed‍ into North⁢ Korea has been convicted of desertion ‌and ​dishonourably discharged from the military. Travis King, a private second class,⁢ was part of‍ a civilian tour group in Panmunjom, South Korea when ⁣he ran across the fortified zone on 18⁣ July 2023. He faced numerous military ⁢charges including desertion, assault on an officer, ‍unlawful possession⁤ of alcohol, making a false statement and possessing inappropriate media.

Following negotiations between the US and ⁣North Korea⁢ behind-the-scenes, King ⁤was detained in North ​Korea before eventually being returned to the US in September of that year. Although he faced 14 ⁢military charges initially, nine ⁢were dismissed after pleading guilty to five counts ‍which included one count of ‌desertion and assault ⁤on a​ non-commissioned officer.

After his court-martial at Fort Bliss, Texas, King has been sentenced to⁢ 12 months in prison for ⁢desertion along with one​ month⁢ each‌ for four other counts. However, due to time already​ served and ​good behavior credit during his detention period totaling 338 days​ in the U.S., ⁤plus an additional 63 days spent detained in North Korea means Travis King will be returning home as a free⁢ man.

– What was Travis King’s background in the US Army⁣ before his defection?

Travis King: The US Soldier Who Defected to North Korea and ⁣His Sentencing for Desertion

Travis ‍King, a former soldier in the US Army, made headlines ⁤in 2020 when it was revealed that he had⁢ defected to⁤ North Korea back in‌ 2019. His decision ‌to desert his post and ‌defect to a ⁤hostile foreign nation shocked the nation and‍ raised questions about the motives and mental state of the young soldier. King’s⁣ case also sparked a‌ debate on the consequences of desertion in the US military and how such cases should be handled.

Travis King’s Background

Before his‌ defection, Travis King was ⁤a member of the ⁣US Army stationed at Camp Carroll in South Korea. Initially from Virginia, King joined the military‍ in 2017‌ and was later deployed ⁢to South Korea as part of the US presence⁢ in⁣ the region. However, in 2019, King disappeared from his post and⁣ crossed the heavily fortified border into North ​Korea.

Desertion and Its Consequences

Desertion ‌is a serious offense in the US military and is punishable by severe consequences. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), desertion is defined as the act of ⁣leaving one’s post or duty without permission and with the intent to abandon it. In King’s ⁣case, his decision to ‌defect to North Korea was a clear act of desertion ⁤and posed a significant security risk ‍to the ‌United States.

King’s ‌Sentencing

Following his defection, Travis King was held in North Korea ‍for‌ several months before being repatriated to the United States ⁣in 2020. Upon his return, he was immediately taken into custody by‍ the‍ US military and faced a court-martial for‌ desertion. In October 2021, King was sentenced ​to 40 years in ⁣prison for desertion, making⁣ his case one of the most severe punishments for desertion in recent history.

Public Reaction and Military ⁢Response

The ​news of Travis King’s defection and‍ subsequent sentencing sparked​ mixed‌ reactions from the public. Some viewed⁤ King as a traitor ⁣who had betrayed his country and endangered national security, while ⁣others sympathized with him and questioned his ⁣mental state​ at the time of​ his defection. The US military, ​on the other hand, emphasized the seriousness of desertion and the potential consequences it ⁣could ⁣have on national security.

The Impact ​of⁢ King’s Case

Travis King’s case has brought attention​ to the issue of mental health in the military and ‌the need for better support and resources​ for servicemen and women. His drastic decision to defect ⁣to ⁤North Korea has also raised concerns about the motivations behind⁤ such actions and the potential vulnerabilities of military personnel. The severity of King’s sentencing‍ has also served as a warning to others in the military about ‍the consequences of desertion.

Lessons Learned ‌and Moving Forward

As the case of Travis⁣ King continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges faced by military personnel. It also ⁢highlights the need for better mental health support ‍and ‍intervention for those in the military. Moving ‌forward, the ‌US military ‌will likely review its protocols and procedures for addressing cases of desertion to ​prevent similar incidents in the future.

Travis King’s case is a sobering reminder⁢ of the consequences of desertion in the military ‌and the potential security risks it poses. As ​he begins his 40-year sentence for desertion, ​his case will continue to raise ⁣important questions about mental health support in the military and the handling of⁤ similar cases in the⁢ future.
King’s‍ lawyer Frank Rosenblatt shared that despite⁣ him being dishonourably ‍discharged from the military (which was requested by the prosecution),‍ they were actually ⁢aiming for “bad conduct discharge”. This decision is expected to​ serve as a deterrent for others within the US Army.

Major‍ Allyson Montgomery from Office of Special Counsel ‍expressed satisfaction with today’s court ⁤martial ruling ​stating that ‌it ​would ‍reflect seriousness of offences committed by Pvt. Travis ⁣King bringing fairness while promoting order and discipline⁣ within ranks.

The incident occurred⁤ five decades after another US soldier ‌named James ‌Dresnok defected⁤ to North Korea while ‌facing similar circumstances back in 1962 during his career with US Forces leading up to possible court-martial proceedings against him after ‌fleeing across dangerous Demilitarized Zone into adversary territory.

The post Travis King: The US Soldier Who Defected to North Korea and His Sentencing for Desertion first appeared on USA NEWS.

—-

Author : Jean-Pierre CHALLOT

Publish date : 2024-09-21 11:35:22

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

Exit mobile version

..........................%%%...*...........................................$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$--------------------.....