Source link : https://health365.info/research-displays-prospective-racial-bias-in-how-docs-report-affected-person-trustworthiness/
Racial bias in clinician review of affected person credibility: Proof from digital well being information. Credit score: Seaside et al., 2025, PLOS One, CC-BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by means of/4.0/)
Clinicians are much more likely to suggest doubt or disbelief within the scientific information of Black sufferers than in the ones of white sufferers—a trend that might give a contribution to ongoing racial disparities in well being care. That’s the conclusion of a find out about, inspecting greater than 13 million medical notes, printed within the open-access magazine PLOS One by means of Mary Catherine Seaside of Johns Hopkins College, U.S.
There may be mounting proof that digital well being information (EHR) include language reflecting the subconscious biases of clinicians, and that this language would possibly undermine the standard of care that sufferers obtain.
Within the new find out about, researchers analyzed 13,065,081 EHR notes written between 2016 and 2023 about 1,537,587 sufferers by means of 12,027 clinicians at a big well being gadget within the mid-Atlantic United States.
They used synthetic intelligence (AI) equipment to search out which notes had language suggesting the clinician doubted the sincerity or narrative competence of the affected person—for instance, pointing out that the affected person “claims,” “insists,” or is “adamant about” their signs, or is a “poor historian.”
General, fewer…
—-
Author : admin
Publish date : 2025-08-13 18:27:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.
—-
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8